美国快速启动财务捐款

概要

美国FSF的贡献为5.1b美元，反映了在具有挑战性的政治和经济环境中做出的积极努力，但还有更多要做的事情。国会和主要机构相对于FSF之前的时期增加了对气候变化目标的资金，并已开始将气候考虑因素整合到正在进行的投资必威官网是真的吗组合中。然而，全球经济衰退和削减支出的压力，加上反对美国对气候变化行动的政策制定者的积极子集，阻碍了气候融资的进一步增加。必威官网是真的吗

关键发现

美国FSF的贡献为5.1b美元，反映了在具有挑战性的政治和经济环境中做出的积极努力，但还有更多要做的事情。国会和主要机构相对于FSF之前的时期增加了对气候变化目标的资金，并已开始将气候考虑因素整合到正在进行的投资必威官网是真的吗组合中。然而，全球经济衰退和削减支出的压力，加上反对美国对气候变化行动的政策制定者的积极子集，阻碍了气候融资的进一步增加。必威官网是真的吗

美国不计入其FSF贡献的私人财务，但它确实计算了非授予工具和开发援助。Loans, loan guarantees, and insurance constitute one-third of the U.S. contribution; grants and related instruments (including contracts and grant contributions to multilateral climate funds) account for the rest. Only a minority of the funds examined – 40% for adaptation and 29% for mitigation – support projects that clearly target climate change as a principal objective, although the remainder can in most cases still be expected to deliver climate benefits. (A greater share may principally target climate change, but adequate information was not available to support this conclusion.)

While the FSF contribution reflects some new effort to address climate change, it is unclear that the contribution as a whole can be considered “new and additional.”Since the start of the FSF period, the United States has substantially increased international finance that explicitly targets climate change. Some U.S. government agencies have also begun integrating climate change into aspects of development assistance and development finance. The United States is also counting as FSF projects and programs that it was funding – and that were likely delivering climate benefits – prior to the FSF period. Furthermore, the United States has distanced itself from targets and timetables to increase development assistance, and climate finance appears to be increasing at a significantly faster rate than development assistance.

There is a need for additional transparency and harmonization in reporting.在过去的几年中，美国已做出了巨大的努力，以改善有关气候融资以及外国援助的监控和报告。必威官网是真的吗但是，还有改进的余地。

执行摘要

Developed country governments have repeatedly committed to provide new and additional finance to help developing countries transition to low-carbon and climate-resilient growth. This assessment considers U.S. efforts to provide “fast start finance” (FSF) in fiscal years 2010 and 2011 in the context of the pledge by developed countries to mobilize $30 billion1 from 2010 to 2012 under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It is part of a series scrutinizing how developed countries are defining, delivering, and reporting FSF.

鉴于其经济规模及其作为温室气体最佳发射极的历史责任，美国在交付FSF方面起着重要作用。美国FSF贡献的关键特征在图1中量化。

Recommendations

We recommend that the United States:

• Publish the criteria it uses to program and identify FSF.
• Publish a detailed list of the projects and programs that constitute FSF, including, for each project, the amount, the administering agency, the financial instrument, the recipient country (where relevant) and institution, whether it is supported by core or non-core climate finance, and, to the extent feasible,information on disbursement status.
• Identify and explain any discrepancies between such a project list and the total reported FSF sum, and explain how non-grant instruments are counted.
• Provide complete information on U.S. FSF in a single document, so that users can avoid the need to download and reconcile over 240 documents to access this information.
• 通过确保与适当的DAC RIO标记标记相关的FSF项目，并使用两个报告系统之间的一致项目标题，通过确保相关的FSF项目标记相关的FSF项目，协调了FSF报告与经济合作与发展组织（OECD）发展援助委员会（DAC）之间的报告。
• 与其他贡献者和多边机构合作，以加强和协调关于气候融资的双边和多边报告。必威官网是真的吗